Institutionalizing Corporate Social Innovation †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Institutionalizing Corporate Social Innovation. Answer: Introduction: Appleyard, and Chesbrough (2017) defined management as the action plan for running and conduction managerial activities in a business. It has been stated by many authors that strategies in an organization are lacking its efficiency due to which the competitive advantage to a company is not received in the global market. However, to analyze the reason behind the non-performance of competitive advantage, business performance shall also be reviewed. Further, the business level strategies in the strategic management of an organization help the company to perceive uncertainty present in the market, firm's resources, competitive advantage and performance of the organization (Hill, Jones, and Schilling, 2014). Michael Porter being the first writer to discuss this concept said that strategic discipline can lead to competitive advantage in an organization. Further, an organization's core objective should initiate to provide better level of satisfaction to the customers of the company and this process is initiated through the use of business level strategies in an organization. They provide detailed action and form plan with the aid of which the company gains the competitive edge in the target market. The process and initiates exploitation of core competencies of the business so as to make fuller utilization of resources and drive profit for business (Peppard, and Ward 2016). According to the type of organization and their objectives, the organization shall adopt the business level strategies which are listed below. Cost leadership is the strategy which mainly focuses on the strategies implemented in an organization to cut the cost of the product and differentiate it in the market on the basis of their low prices. Price of the product is based on the internal productivity on the basis of which profit margin is decided by the management of the company (Bettis, et. al., 2014). In order to create sustainability in the market, the company needs to implement some strategies which create a differential position of their product in the target market. so, which the use of cost leadership strategy the company places such a price of the product which is not offered by any other competitor in the market; due to this feature of the business strategy they gain competitive advantage in the target market (Jannesson, Nilsson, and Rapp 2016). Under this process standardized products are offered with lowest prices due to which customers are intensified to buy the product from the market, this also cuts competitio n in the market. Some, ways through which the company can apply this strategy in their management is by implementing the complex organizational system (this will make it difficult for competitors to imitate them), or by maintaining strict control over the cost of production, or by minimizing the expense on research and development (Buller, and McEvoy 2016). The porter's forces model better explains the cost leadership method in an organization in different circumstances as well. The components of five forces are discussed below (appendices 1). Rivalry explains the competitors of the organization, in this type of business strategy companies, do not prefer to initiate price war since with this effect the low-cost firms still get to earn profit even after the competitors compete away their profits. One such example of this is the airline's industry under which firms having low-cost carriers still get to earn profit even after the price war. The customers' aspect of Porter's model explains the power of customers who force the firms to produce goods and services at low profits, due to most of the firm exit from the market due to having below average profit (Chen, Delmas, and Lieberman 2015). This result in creating monopoly for companies having cost leadership and creating identified place in the market. In case of suppliers, the cost leader companies get to absorb more price increase even before they raise the price to the customers (appendices 2). Entry is although open it becomes difficult for new and emerging companies to s ustain their growth in the market by optimizing minimum profits along with low cost. The cost leaders lower their cost of the product so that the customers present in the market stay with them only, thus this process initiates less substitution of the product (Andersen, and Andersson, 2017). Another mode of business strategy is the differentiation which provides value to customers in the market initiating product differentiation in the market. This business strategy prefers in creating product differentiation in the market rather than lowering the cost and initiating cost leadership. The value of this strategy is can be created by lowering cost of buyers and raising the buyer's performance. Also, differentiation in an organization can be created through creating high-quality product and uniqueness in them, due to which take the high cost for the companies to enter the market. The Porter's five forces model identifies that under this strategy effective differentiators can lead to gain leadership in the market. The companies which sell unique products which differentiated quality in-build within them can gain market capitalization (appendices 3). In the aspect of rivalry, there are fewer chances of other competitors to cease the market share, as the product manufactured by the company is highly specialized in the market. Further, according to Peppard, and Ward (2016) in case of suppliers, it shall be known that as the differentiators enjoy charging differential prices of the product in the market due to which they can tend to absorb higher costs, to which the customers are also willing to pay more for the product. In the entrants' aspect of the porter's model, it becomes hard for the entrants to enter in such market, a loyalty maintained on the part of customers as once the brand loyalty is maintained it becomes difficult to another company which sells diff erentiated products. Another aspect of Porter's generic business level strategy is the focused low cost model. Under this process, an organization not only selects low-cost model in the market but also aim to select a smaller segment of the market to supply their goods and services in the market. Such model for business process aims to compete in companies on the basis of prices, and they eliminate more competition by selling their products to a particular segment of the market. Apart from that, according to Arasti, Khaleghi and Noori (2017) the fourth business level model focuses on creating differentiation in products. The organization which uses this model focuses on creating product differentiation in the market, but they also select a smaller segment of group to target in the market. It is a narrow concept which is applied in various business sectors that have their business activities diverse in a smaller segment of the market. They reduce competition by supplying to a small segment of the market and that too providing differentiation in their product due to which brand loyalty is created in the market for the product insisting sales for them (Short, et. al., 2016). The last business model is the integrated cost leadership or differentiated product leadership in the market. This strategy has now become popular in the global business context as it is majorly used by companies nowadays. Firms using this strategy get to adopt the environmental changes in a better way and learn new skills and techniques to use in the business process. Moreover, the model leads to effectively leverage the core competencies of their business process and product line in which they exist. It will initiate the company to manufacture the products which differentiated features and specialized costs as well. Thus, this type of model provides advantage to the customers as well, as hey also get differential featured products at comparatively lower costs in the market. So, due to this process, they are inspired to buy the company's product (Horwath 2017). The above defined strategic management model is the concept which is currently used by business process to develop effective sale in the market along with competitive advantage as well. As the business strategy is the requirement of every business process, irrespective of their time period of the type of business functions, so below mentioned involves the phases in which the business process evolved till date. According to Fenton, et al., (2015) first phase includes the budgetary planning process. This process was implemented by the companies in the period of 1950-1960. The major of this type of model was to acknowledge the requirements of the customers present in the market and fulfill them according to the resources available with the company. The second phase in business strategy occurred between the periods of 1960-1968, under which the companies focused more on corporate planning than fulfillment of societal objective. This strategy worked in such a way that companies started develops their long-term business objectives which they aim to fulfill by the way of their internal process activities (appendices 4). Further, under corporate planning three strategies were defined by Chandler mainly, horizontal which implies growth in the market irrespective of the size of the market. Another was vertical which included absorbing functions that are backward towards supplier and forward towards the prospective customers of the society (Horwath 2017). Lastly, the diversification mode related to the decision of the company to enter in the relevant or irrelevant market and diversify their activities to initiate expansion and fulfill long-term objectives. The next business strategy (1968-1975) included the activities of an organization to initiate portfolio planning to plot their products in the correct target market and achieve the growth and share matrix decided. The fourth phase included the industry and competitive analysis strategy of the company. Under this model, the porter five forces were defined as the firm tried to take a closer look towards the activities of the market. This type of business model analyzed the growth of the company in terms of the industry growth and competitive advantages present with the company in the current scenario (Punt, et. al., 2016). The next phase was the internal sourcing of competitive advantage under which a resource-based theory was applied by the management of the company by focusing on gaining the competitive advantage in the market. The companies introduced the term core competencies and focused on them to gain customer maximization. Next phase of the business strategy discussed by Casadesus?Masanell, and Zhu (2013)was the evolution of strategic innovation and implementation, this process introduced the way of companies to such strategies and resources in such a way that the company aspires to secure a sustainable position of them in the target market. The companies which applied this strategy firstly embraced their management with innovation and used tools and measures to implement such practices in the management (Herrera 2015). The next phase was the strategic management and simplification strategy under which the main emphasis the companies laid on execution of objectives and practices defined for the management. The process of strategic thinking gave a deeper sense to the activities initiated by the management as they enhanced the business decision-making process and simplified the complex features of the management. The strategic management has immediate response to the changes happened in the management system initiating skilled development. Lastly, the facts came to no existence that strategic thinking and applying such feature in the management adequately assist the business to coordinate the objective of the company with the practices of the management. Thus, the company started using this strategic model to enhance their skills and abilities. The different business model used in the current era forms a part of this strategic management model (Baumgartner, et. al., 2014). Concluding the above analysis the fact that shall be noticed that the strategic management approach to the business is now an important part of the business with the aid of which, they earn profits and initiates sustainability in the management system. Further, the strategic management business model has evolved with time which helped the management to initialize competitive advantage in the company in the target market. The basic aim of these models is to fully utilize the efficiencies of the resources and drive them in the direction of achieving adequate returns for the company. Thus, it shall be said that the business model of an organization actively participates in the growth of an organization in the competitive world. References Andersen, T.J. and Andersson, U., 2017. Multinational Corporate Strategy-Making: Integrating International Business and Strategic Management. In The Responsive Global Organization: New Insights from Global Strategy and International Business (pp. 13-34). Emerald Publishing Limited. Appleyard, M.M. and Chesbrough, H.W., 2017. The dynamics of open strategy: from adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50(3), pp.310-321. Arasti, M., Khaleghi, M. and Noori, J., 2017. Corporate-level technology strategy and its linkage with corporate strategy in multi-business companies: IKCO case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, pp.243-252. Baumgartner, L.J., Conallin, J., Wooden, I., Campbell, B., Gee, R., Robinson, W.A. and Mallen?Cooper, M., 2014. Using flow guilds of freshwater fish in an adaptive management framework to simplify environmental flow delivery for semi?arid riverine systems. Fish and Fisheries, 15(3), pp.410-427. Bettis, R., Gambardella, A., Helfat, C. and Mitchell, W., 2014. Quantitative empirical analysis in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), pp.949-953. Buller, P.F. and McEvoy, G.M., 2016. A model for implementing a sustainability strategy through HRM practices. Business and Society Review, 121(4), pp.465-495. Casadesus?Masanell, R. and Zhu, F., 2013. Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor?based business models. Strategic management journal, 34(4), pp.464-482. Chen, C.M., Delmas, M.A. and Lieberman, M.B., 2015. Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), pp.19-36. Fenton, P., Gustafsson, S., Ivner, J. and Palm, J., 2015. Sustainable Energy and Climate Strategies: lessons from planning processes in five municipalities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, pp.213-221. Herrera, M.E.B., 2015. Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), pp.1468-1474. Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014. Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning. Horwath, R., 2017. The Evolution of Business Strategy. Strategic Thinking Institute. Pp 2-6. Jannesson, E., Nilsson, F. and Rapp, B., 2016. Strategy, Control and Competitive Advantage. SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN AN. Peppard, J. and Ward, J., 2016. The strategic management of information systems: Building a digital strategy. John Wiley Sons. Punt, A.E., Butterworth, D.S., Moor, C.L., De Oliveira, J.A. and Haddon, M., 2016. Management strategy evaluation: best practices. Fish and Fisheries, 17(2), pp.303-334. Short, J.C., McKenny, A.F., Ketchen, D.J., Snow, C.C. and Hult, G.T.M., 2016. An empirical examination of firm, industry, and temporal effects on corporate social performance. Business Society, 55(8), pp.1122-1156.